Skip to content

Randy Guliuzza

Episode: 96

Today on the Servant Leadership Podcast we welcome Randy Guliuzza, the President of the Institute for Creation Research. Randy leads ICR — one of the world’s most influential organizations dedicated to biblical creation science. For more than fifty years, ICR has produced original research, scientific publications, and educational resources that have reached millions of people, including through the Discovery Center in Dallas. Randy brings a rare set of credentials to the work — being both a medical doctor and a professional engineer. He earned a Master of Public Health at Harvard, served as a U.S. Air Force flight surgeon, and is the architect of the Continuous Environmental Tracking model, a framework reshaping how Christians think about adaptation and design in biology. Randy leads from a posture of conviction and stewardship — faithful to the truth he has been called to defend, and committed to the legacy and mission ICR was founded on. Join us as Randy talks about the case for biblical creation, how Christian leaders should think about the intersection of faith and science, and what it’s like to lead one of the country’s most prominent creation-science organizations.

Prev Episode

00:00:00
We went on a second date for to get some

00:00:02
pizza. And during conversations

00:00:04
following that, she told me, you know,

00:00:06
Randy, I got to tell you something. And

00:00:08
I thought, she's going to tell me best

00:00:10
guy she's ever dated for sure.

00:00:11
[laughter] And she said, Randy, you're

00:00:14
going to hell. And what?

00:00:23
Today on the servant leadership podcast,

00:00:25
we welcome Randy Goulya, the president

00:00:27
of the Institute for Creation Research.

00:00:30
Randy leads ICR, one of the world's most

00:00:33
influential organizations dedicated to

00:00:35
biblical creation science. For more than

00:00:38
50 years, ICR has produced original

00:00:41
research, scientific publications, and

00:00:43
educational resources that have reached

00:00:46
millions of people, including through

00:00:47
the Discovery Center in Dallas. Randy

00:00:50
brings a rare set of credentials to the

00:00:52
work. Being both a medical doctor and a

00:00:55
professional engineer, he earned a

00:00:57
master of public health at Harvard,

00:00:58
served as a US Air Force flight surgeon,

00:01:01
and is the architect of the continuous

00:01:03
environmental tracking model, a

00:01:04
framework reshaping how Christians think

00:01:06
about adaptation and design in biology.

00:01:09
Join us as Randy talks about the case

00:01:11
for biblical creation, how Christian

00:01:13
leaders should think about the

00:01:14
intersection of faith and science, and

00:01:16
what it's like to lead one of the

00:01:17
country's most prominent creation

00:01:19
science organizations.

00:01:21
Randy, thank you for being on the

00:01:23
servant leadership podcast.

00:01:24
Yeah, thank you so much for the

00:01:25
invitation.

00:01:26
This this is such a special place. Uh

00:01:29
being at ICR, seeing the discovery

00:01:31
center, I found out about this like 3 or

00:01:34
4 months ago and got to meet you and I

00:01:36
was just like, we have to ask if you'd

00:01:37
be on the show. So, uh, this is special.

00:01:41
Um, share with us what is ICR? What is

00:01:45
the discovery center? And we'll get into

00:01:46
a whole lot of other stuff, too.

00:01:48
Great. Thanks for so much for coming out

00:01:50
and asking on that. ICR was actually

00:01:52
started in 1970 and it stands for the

00:01:56
Institute for Creation Research

00:01:58
and it was started as a reaction to the

00:02:01
the dominant thought of the day which

00:02:03
was evolutionary thinking and it was

00:02:05
pretty much taking over the thinking

00:02:08
inside the church too. There people were

00:02:10
thinking how can I work in evolutionary

00:02:12
thinking into Christianity and the the

00:02:15
two really don't fit with each other

00:02:17
very well. Evolutionary theory was was

00:02:19
built to be an a non-theistic view for

00:02:22
the origin of the universe and a because

00:02:25
it's kind of got a cosmological natural

00:02:27
selection view to it now and a

00:02:29
non-theistic view for the origin of life

00:02:31
and a non-theistic view for the

00:02:33
development of life. So it's hard to

00:02:35
work a non-theistic view into a theistic

00:02:37
view. Our founder Dr. Dr. Henry A.

00:02:39
Morris recognized that and he was an

00:02:41
engineer and he was at Virginia Tech at

00:02:44
the time and started ICR in San Diego,

00:02:47
California.

00:02:48
We were there for many years and did

00:02:50
some groundbreaking research

00:02:52
particularly in the area of geology and

00:02:54
researching Mount St. Helens as a model

00:02:57
for how you would explain worldwide

00:02:59
geology. The the flat layers and

00:03:02
trapping sediments very very quickly and

00:03:05
building up a lot of sediments in a very

00:03:07
very short period of time. That would be

00:03:09
a model for what would happen after a

00:03:10
worldwide flood.

00:03:12
And we stayed there for quite a few

00:03:14
years until we relocated to Dallas in

00:03:17
the mid 2000s. Um because mainly cost of

00:03:20
living. And once we once we got here,

00:03:23
you mentioned our discovery center. It

00:03:24
was always a goal to build a museum.

00:03:28
It's really an educational center to

00:03:30
teach people about the research that

00:03:32
we've done in the past and to meld it

00:03:36
with a solid biblical worldview and

00:03:39
bring in the gospel for them. So people

00:03:41
who are interested in the areas of

00:03:43
science and faith and how those two

00:03:45
relate to each other can turn to

00:03:48
icr.org. They can find thousands of

00:03:50
articles that we've written if they have

00:03:52
questions about things or they can learn

00:03:54
about our discovery center and plan a

00:03:55
trip the next time they're in the DFW

00:03:57
area.

00:03:58
Well, in the Discovery Center, you use

00:04:00
the word museum and that's that's for

00:04:02
sure the right word, but when I went

00:04:05
through it, it was way more than a

00:04:07
museum. It was so interactive. I mean,

00:04:09
even like, not to give it away, but like

00:04:12
the first room people go in, like

00:04:14
there's interactive video stuff going on

00:04:16
that I've never even seen happening on

00:04:18
the walls and and as people go through

00:04:20
it, I was excited for my family to go

00:04:22
through it. How How did that come to be?

00:04:24
Well, we wanted something that wasn't

00:04:26
boring. And

00:04:27
it definitely isn't boring,

00:04:29
right? It has to be educational, but we

00:04:31
didn't want it to be boring. So um there

00:04:33
are a lot of people out there who are

00:04:35
very very creative and they came up I

00:04:38
don't want to give away the the things

00:04:39
either. They came up with these good

00:04:41
interactive ways to get the message

00:04:43
across yet captivate attention and keep

00:04:47
you listening to what's actually

00:04:49
happening. And uh so it's you're right

00:04:52
it's it's I undersold it when I said

00:04:54
it's a museum. It's far more than a

00:04:56
museum. It's an educational center where

00:04:59
you your kids will be able to learn but

00:05:02
have a good time while you're doing it.

00:05:04
Wow. Okay. So, when people think about

00:05:07
ICR, when they think about the Discovery

00:05:09
Center and they hear you're running it,

00:05:11
they probably think, well, boy, Ry's

00:05:13
been a creationist his whole life. Uh,

00:05:16
he's probably been an extremely

00:05:18
conservative Christian his whole life

00:05:19
and all these things. Uh, that's not

00:05:21
really your story. Talk about your

00:05:23
journey to even end up here.

00:05:25
Right. No, that isn't my story in the

00:05:27
slightest. In fact, uh I I I was a young

00:05:32
man growing up in a home with wonder,

00:05:34
wonderful parents, but we never went to

00:05:36
church. Never I never heard the gospel.

00:05:39
None of those things were were a part of

00:05:41
my life in any way whatsoever. But I

00:05:44
love science and I followed the science

00:05:49
to use today's phrase. I was one, you

00:05:51
wouldn't have even had to tell me now,

00:05:53
follow the science. I I was one of those

00:05:55
who followed the science lockstock and

00:05:57
barrel. And when they told me that we

00:06:00
evolved from ape-like ancestors, I

00:06:02
bought it. I believed it. When they said

00:06:04
there was a natural origin of life

00:06:06
through some kind of experiment here

00:06:08
that sparked some gases, I believed it.

00:06:10
In fact, I thought, "Oh, this explains

00:06:12
how how life got going." So, I was a

00:06:15
true blue believer in in in science at

00:06:20
that time. But I I I I I didn't know

00:06:24
anything about the gospel. Nothing like

00:06:26
this. I met a gal in high school who

00:06:29
just caught my attention and I asked her

00:06:31
to go out on a date with me to go roller

00:06:34
skating. So I know people don't do that

00:06:36
these days, but that's what I wanted to

00:06:37
do. And I um I really wish she would go,

00:06:41
but she would just become a new

00:06:42
Christian. And her Sunday school teacher

00:06:44
told her she should only date

00:06:45
Christians.

00:06:46
But she's a new Christian, so she she

00:06:49
tossed out like a test. Well, I'll go on

00:06:51
a date with you if you come to church

00:06:53
with me. And she thought, well, if I say

00:06:56
yes, it's because I'm a believer. I said

00:06:58
yes because I thought this is a like a

00:07:01
guaranteed second date. You know, if I

00:07:03
mess up on Friday, I'll recoup on

00:07:05
Sunday.

00:07:06
Yeah.

00:07:06
And um so I went to church with her and

00:07:08
I heard the gospel

00:07:09
for the first time,

00:07:11
but it didn't register. But I asked her

00:07:14
for a second date. We went on a second

00:07:16
date for to get some pizza. And during

00:07:18
conversations following that, she told

00:07:20
me, "You know, Randy, I got to tell you

00:07:23
something." And I thought, "She's going

00:07:24
to tell me best guy she's ever dated for

00:07:26
sure." And she said, "Randy, you're

00:07:29
going to hell." And what? Where did this

00:07:33
come from?

00:07:33
Not a good date.

00:07:34
Yeah, I know that I've had bad dates,

00:07:37
but they didn't merit hell. And

00:07:39
[laughter] And so she explained um the

00:07:43
gospel, and I was pretty defensive. I

00:07:45
thought, well, I'm I'm really a pretty

00:07:47
good person. I'm a I'm I obey my

00:07:49
parents. I obey the law. I obey my

00:07:52
teachers, which was really true, but I

00:07:54
claimed it. And um over this kind of

00:07:58
conversation, over many, many weeks of

00:08:01
dating her,

00:08:02
the the truth that I was a sinner, that

00:08:05
I was under a penalty for that sin, that

00:08:08
I was under judgment, that came through

00:08:10
loud and clear. And eventually with some

00:08:14
additional witnessing and reading the

00:08:15
Bible that she gave me for graduation

00:08:17
from high school, I realized that, you

00:08:20
know, I couldn't merit salvation. I

00:08:23
couldn't earn God's favor by being a

00:08:26
good person and things. I needed to have

00:08:28
a righteousness that was given to me on

00:08:31
behalf of the work of the Lord Jesus

00:08:34
Christ on the cross on my behalf.

00:08:37
Uh and and that is when the light really

00:08:40
went on. There was a verse, for God made

00:08:42
him to be sin for us who knew no sin

00:08:45
that we might be made the righteousness

00:08:47
of God in him. Him being the Lord Jesus

00:08:51
Christ. And I saw this exchange and it

00:08:55
made sense. My sin to him, he paid it

00:08:57
his righteousness to me. And uh there

00:09:00
was a verse that really spoke to me

00:09:02
where the Lord Jesus said, "Truly, truly

00:09:03
I say unto you, he that hears my words

00:09:07
and believes on him that sent me has

00:09:09
everlasting life and will not come into

00:09:11
condemnation, but has passed from death

00:09:14
unto life." And I wanted that. I got

00:09:16
down on my knees and ask the Lord to

00:09:19
forgive my sin and to be my Lord and

00:09:20
Savior. All because that gal was

00:09:23
witnessing to me. And and now in about

00:09:26
eight days, we'll have been married 48

00:09:28
years. Wow. Well, and so you became a

00:09:31
Christian and you still were

00:09:35
not interested in creation and didn't

00:09:37
believe any of that. You still believe

00:09:39
the science, right?

00:09:40
Right. Exactly.

00:09:40
So, so how did that happen? That

00:09:42
transition over time.

00:09:44
Well, it was it was a transition, but it

00:09:46
was really kind of a fast transition.

00:09:49
I I felt the Lord was leading us into

00:09:51
ministry. We got married uh about a year

00:09:53
out of high school and we then I was in

00:09:56
engineering college and I transferred to

00:09:57
Moody Bible Institute

00:09:59
kind of like in your stomping grounds

00:10:01
right now in Chicago

00:10:03
and I still held to evolutionary

00:10:05
thinking and I thought you could you

00:10:07
could blend the two together and I would

00:10:10
believe it or not

00:10:11
I would argue with my fellow Moody

00:10:13
students for theistic evolution. It's

00:10:15
like I can't believe I did that. Um, and

00:10:19
I one day in the library I found the

00:10:22
free magazine that ICR still gives away

00:10:25
to this day over 50 years later called

00:10:28
Acts and Facts. And I said, "Oh, this

00:10:30
relates to science." So I took it back

00:10:32
to the cubicle. There were two articles

00:10:34
in it written very clearly by man named

00:10:38
Dr. Dwayne Gish. one on the natural

00:10:41
origin of life and he pointed out all

00:10:43
the flaws of that experiment which I

00:10:45
thought was just so conclusive and and

00:10:49
it it just that life can't start by

00:10:52
natural processes. It's just not going

00:10:54
to happen.

00:10:54
And then he had another article of why

00:10:56
when you find a fossil of a creature,

00:10:59
let's say it's a fossil shrimp, it looks

00:11:02
like a shrimp today.

00:11:03
You find a fossil ant looks like an ant

00:11:05
today. Fossil bat looks like a bat

00:11:07
today. And supposedly tens of millions

00:11:10
of years have passed, but they haven't

00:11:12
evolved one iota.

00:11:14
Now, slight little changes, but no

00:11:16
evolution. And I thought, I never

00:11:18
thought of that. And that was another

00:11:20
really good article. And really in that

00:11:22
cubicle at the library of Moody Bible

00:11:24
Institute, I thought, this is true. I've

00:11:28
been snookered [laughter] on this for

00:11:31
all these times. Wow.

00:11:32
I started to live for that magazine to

00:11:34
come and I knew the Lord was leading me

00:11:36
into creation science ministry and that

00:11:38
led to more and more education.

00:11:40
Wow. So talk about the more education

00:11:43
piece because even though you knew that

00:11:45
was a ministry, you get into this

00:11:46
ministry at some point. Maybe not here,

00:11:48
but uh your journey to get here has been

00:11:51
unbelievable from an academia

00:11:53
standpoint.

00:11:54
It was it was all under the advice of

00:11:57
mostly that man Dr. Dwayne Gish

00:11:59
who was the vice president of the

00:12:01
Institute for Creation Research at that

00:12:03
time.

00:12:04
But initially, this is before your day,

00:12:06
you could dial 411 and pick a real

00:12:10
operator picked up the phone and I said,

00:12:12
I like the phone number for Dr. Henry M.

00:12:14
Morrison in San Diego and I got it and I

00:12:17
called him.

00:12:18
Wow.

00:12:18
And I said, you know, I've got two years

00:12:20
of engineering education and I'm going

00:12:22
to graduate with a degree in theology

00:12:24
from Moody. I want to work for ICR. M

00:12:26
and he said, 'Well, good. Um, and now I

00:12:30
know every time I hear the word well. I

00:12:33
was like, oh, no. I said, it's a

00:12:35
technical degree, technical ministry.

00:12:37
You should go back and finish your

00:12:38
engineering degree. So, I reapplied to

00:12:40
South Dakota School of Minds.

00:12:42
Finished off my engineering degree. Uh,

00:12:44
I was desperate for money at the time. I

00:12:46
went into the Navy. They put me on

00:12:48
active duty while I was still in

00:12:49
college. Um and I was served as a civil

00:12:53
engineer in the Navy for almost a

00:12:55
decade. During that time talking with

00:12:57
Dr. Gish um I got my professional

00:13:00
engineering license and I called him

00:13:03
after about that time and I said no Dr.

00:13:06
Gish I got this degree from Moody and

00:13:07
I'm an engineer now and and I'm prof

00:13:10
professional engineer I want to work for

00:13:12
ICR.

00:13:13
He said well oh no

00:13:16
here we go again.

00:13:17
Here we go again. you really need to

00:13:19
know biology and you should get a

00:13:21
doctorate.

00:13:22
And I was like, oh, I don't know if I

00:13:24
want to start from scratch. That led to

00:13:26
the idea to go to medical school. And so

00:13:28
I went to medical school, University of

00:13:30
Minnesota, finished off the MD degree,

00:13:33
and I took an Air Force scholarship for

00:13:35
that. And then I went into the Air

00:13:37
Force, and the Air Force sent me to get

00:13:39
a masters in public health at Harvard.

00:13:41
And I went there because these are all

00:13:43
good credentials, and I'll learn some

00:13:46
things along the line.

00:13:48
So finally after I paid back all the

00:13:50
time for med school to the Air Force and

00:13:52
for the Harvard education, I called up

00:13:55
ICR. I said, 'Now look, I I've got this

00:13:59
degree in theology from Moody. I'm a

00:14:01
professional engineer. I'm licensed. I

00:14:03
went to medical school. I'm board

00:14:04
certified in aerospace medicine. I got

00:14:06
this degree from Harvard. I'd like to

00:14:07
work for you. And they said, "Sure. Um,

00:14:11
what's been taking you so long?"

00:14:13
And it was about 28 years from the first

00:14:16
time I called Henry Morris till I

00:14:18
started to work for ICR.

00:14:20
But from from a leadership standpoint,

00:14:23
the lesson learned was um first let the

00:14:26
Lord's calling dictate your decisions.

00:14:30
And so his calling in the creation

00:14:31
science ministry dictated go to this

00:14:33
school, go do this, do this. And he led

00:14:37
me along the way. And he eventually gave

00:14:40
me the desires of my heart.

00:14:42
But the path obviously wasn't a straight

00:14:45
line it went. But everything I learned

00:14:48
along the path has been very useful for

00:14:54
this ministry and particularly to be the

00:14:55
president of this organization. I was a

00:14:58
friendly person but I learned a lot of

00:15:00
people skills in medical school. I

00:15:03
learned to care in ways that I hadn't

00:15:06
cared before

00:15:08
um for these people by going to medical

00:15:11
school. And then all the time as a naval

00:15:13
officer and then as an Air Force

00:15:15
officer, you know, you picked up

00:15:17
leadership skills, you picked up

00:15:19
managerial skills, you picked up the way

00:15:22
to communicate a vision

00:15:24
to people and that's been valuable,

00:15:27
invaluable in this job all along the

00:15:30
way. So I got the education for creation

00:15:33
science but he was equipping.

00:15:36
Yeah. I would think this is a unique

00:15:38
organization to lead because you have a

00:15:40
lot of passionate people who you

00:15:42
interact with on every side of the

00:15:44
spectrum, right? You've got passionate

00:15:45
people who are like, "Oh, I fully buy in

00:15:47
and you guys aren't saying enough and

00:15:49
you probably have people who are so

00:15:51
convinced like you were uh at one point

00:15:54
in your life where it's like, hey, you

00:15:55
guys are crazy and this is just it's not

00:15:57
scientific." Uh what's it like trying to

00:16:00
lead well? Um in in that dichotomy

00:16:05
there is a dichotomy. You you summarized

00:16:07
it well. You know they be like oh you're

00:16:09
nuts and this isn't science. This is a

00:16:12
pseudocience on that. Well what what my

00:16:16
approach to them is also from that

00:16:18
background.

00:16:19
I don't I don't get mad. I I was in your

00:16:22
position. I thought like you. I I know

00:16:24
where it's coming from. But I also know

00:16:26
you're you're probably not really

00:16:29
studying the issues. You're probably

00:16:30
listening a lot to what other people

00:16:32
have told you. And if you get and you

00:16:35
dig in and I get a chance to talk with

00:16:38
them about some specifics, then I'll

00:16:41
almost always hear, "Well, nobody's ever

00:16:44
told me that before."

00:16:45
Oh, you you discuss it in a purely

00:16:48
scientific way. I expected you to be a

00:16:50
Bible thumper or a Bible preacher, but

00:16:52
you're you're telling me scientific

00:16:54
things that I've never heard. You've

00:16:57
really uh you've really stirred up my

00:17:00
curiosity in in ways that I haven't

00:17:01
heard before. Occasionally, there's a

00:17:04
person where I might as well be talking

00:17:06
to this mug.

00:17:07
You know, I I'll talk and I'll I'll

00:17:10
explain something and their next

00:17:12
question is, "But what how do you

00:17:14
explain this?" And I'll answer that.

00:17:15
Well, how do you explain this and I'll

00:17:17
answer that? And I realize they just

00:17:20
want to argue.

00:17:21
And with them, I'll usually say, you

00:17:24
know, the Bible says, "Taste and see

00:17:27
that the Lord is good."

00:17:29
So, I'm I I'm not going to argue. I'm

00:17:32
going to say just turn to these these

00:17:34
books in the Bible, read them, and and

00:17:36
see if you see the Lord as good.

00:17:37
Yeah. On the other hand, we do have a

00:17:40
passionate scientists and we have

00:17:42
passionate team members here who in some

00:17:45
ways

00:17:48
it's I'm not going to say hurting cats,

00:17:51
but they definitely have their idea of

00:17:53
what they like to research. I do this, I

00:17:55
this, this, this, this. And it's the

00:17:59
challenge is channel that energy and

00:18:03
move it towards projects that are really

00:18:06
big picture. big picture in terms of the

00:18:09
creation evolution discussion, not the

00:18:12
trivial stuff.

00:18:14
So big picture, big impact. In other

00:18:17
words, it's it's not just a big deal,

00:18:19
but if if we answer this question, this

00:18:23
will really move the needle

00:18:25
in people's thinking. But it also has to

00:18:28
be easy to understand

00:18:31
[laughter] so that when you tell it to

00:18:34
the person in the pew, they don't just

00:18:36
glaze over like

00:18:38
what are you even talking about? It has

00:18:41
to catch them.

00:18:42
So I'll give you a quick quick example.

00:18:44
Let's say let's say you can find a

00:18:46
dinosaur bone and you can dissolve away

00:18:49
the minerals and you still find flexible

00:18:52
blood vessels

00:18:53
in it. flexible blood vessels and maybe

00:18:57
those blood vessels even have red blood

00:18:59
cells in them on that. Wow. That's

00:19:02
that's pretty big picture because what I

00:19:04
was told in school is that these bones

00:19:06
were rock.

00:19:07
Mhm.

00:19:08
They were completely all the mineral

00:19:10
products were completely replaced with

00:19:12
with um other types of hard minerals in

00:19:16
them and that they're 60 to 100 million

00:19:20
years old on this. Well, one wait a

00:19:23
second here. How do I explain that you

00:19:26
can still find blood vessels in them?

00:19:29
That doesn't sound like it's turned to

00:19:31
rock. And I know these kind of tissues

00:19:35
don't last for hundreds, tens to

00:19:37
hundreds of millions of years.

00:19:39
And the average person in the pew

00:19:40
understands that, too. They deal with

00:19:42
tissue all the time.

00:19:44
And they know it rots. They know it's

00:19:46
gone. So this is a big impact, big

00:19:50
picture, easy to understand thing that

00:19:53
we're working on that is a is a

00:19:56
worthwhile project.

00:19:57
Wow. Well, one of the things that I

00:19:59
loved touring this is, and it goes to

00:20:02
what you said, some of these things are

00:20:04
so complex, but you simplify them so

00:20:07
that anyone can understand it. Uh, I

00:20:10
said to you before we started filming

00:20:12
even, um, this helped me understand why

00:20:15
I believe some of the things I believe

00:20:17
and like actually put some concretenness

00:20:19
to it. Uh, when you think through,

00:20:22
you've had so many conversations,

00:20:24
debates, all kinds of opinions. What are

00:20:27
some of the things that you feel like,

00:20:28
hey, when we tell people this or when

00:20:30
they understand this, like what helps

00:20:32
move them over the line to realize like,

00:20:34
oh, maybe these guys aren't crazy. This

00:20:36
is actually real science. um in using

00:20:39
Bible like using the Bible as part of

00:20:42
it.

00:20:42
Well,

00:20:45
it's not as hard to move them over the

00:20:46
line as a lot of people might think.

00:20:49
Sometimes it's just presenting evidence

00:20:52
to them and having them look at it from

00:20:55
a different perspective. So, let's take

00:20:57
the research at Mount St. Helens that

00:20:59
was one of our pioneering projects.

00:21:02
that whole eruption um really really was

00:21:05
a good model for what a catastrophe

00:21:07
would would look like. So when I was an

00:21:09
engineering student, I was actually a

00:21:10
mining engineering student. I took a lot

00:21:12
of geology and I was taught that the

00:21:14
present is the key to the past and that

00:21:17
that the rates and processes we see

00:21:19
today are probably have been steady

00:21:21
state or mostly steady state throughout

00:21:24
the history of of the earth. Maybe maybe

00:21:26
interrupted by a few minor catastrophes,

00:21:28
local catastrophes.

00:21:30
And and so I was taught that there were

00:21:33
large inland oceans that place deposits

00:21:36
and then they would recede and there'd

00:21:38
be vast periods of time and more inland

00:21:40
oceans would come and that these layers

00:21:42
built up like this

00:21:44
over a long period of time. And I I

00:21:45
bought the story

00:21:47
and then someone started saying, "Well,

00:21:49
wait a second here. There's some

00:21:51
problems with thinking like that. First

00:21:52
of all, all of us have gone out and

00:21:54
we've seen the layers. They're like

00:21:56
stacked flat right on top of each other.

00:21:58
you everybody sees them.

00:22:00
And so if something came in and placed

00:22:04
these layers and then that went away,

00:22:06
wouldn't you expect to see erosion?

00:22:08
Wouldn't you expect to see dirt and

00:22:09
sediment and branches and stuff like

00:22:11
soil in between those layers and and

00:22:14
that? But you don't see that. You see

00:22:16
flat lines, boom, boom, boom, stacked

00:22:18
right on top. What processes are doing

00:22:20
that today? Huh? I don't know of any.

00:22:24
And look how thick these sedimentary

00:22:25
rock layers are. like big thick

00:22:27
sandstones, big thick limestones, big

00:22:30
thick shells.

00:22:32
Um, yeah, they are big and thick. Well,

00:22:34
what processes are doing that today? H,

00:22:38
I can't think of any. You find massive

00:22:40
coal deposits where vegetation has been

00:22:44
buried sometimes 60 miles long and the

00:22:47
coal's 100 ft thick.

00:22:49
H, what processes are burying vegetation

00:22:53
like that? You find layers with

00:22:55
literally billions of fossils in them.

00:22:58
Trapped. Boom. Rapidly trapped. Where

00:23:02
where do I find processes burying

00:23:04
billions of fossils today? I And so when

00:23:07
someone starts pointing these things

00:23:09
out, I don't find this process today. I

00:23:11
don't find it. And now our current

00:23:13
research has looked at borehole logs

00:23:15
that oil companies and other mineral

00:23:18
exploration companies have drilled down

00:23:20
into the earth and they log what's

00:23:22
coming out. geologist looks and they can

00:23:25
get the thickness of the layers and the

00:23:27
types of rocks. And sure enough, we've

00:23:30
looked at over 3,000 of these from all

00:23:32
over the world

00:23:34
and we can demonstrate you find some of

00:23:36
the same layers and the same relative

00:23:39
order on every continent on the planet.

00:23:44
Now, what process would put the same

00:23:46
layers in the same order on all of the

00:23:48
continents? Well, flat layers, fossils,

00:23:51
coal, these a worldwide flood seems to

00:23:54
tie everything together and make really

00:23:58
good sense of the geology and and and

00:24:00
many many other parts of geology which

00:24:03
would be trivial to most people but

00:24:05
important to geologists. It can explain

00:24:08
those things as well. So, you go and you

00:24:11
do a talk like that. There was nothing

00:24:13
super complicated.

00:24:15
The average person, I never I never

00:24:17
thought about that. And then another

00:24:20
observation which someone brought to my

00:24:21
attention I never thought about when I

00:24:23
went to the Grand Canyon initially like

00:24:25
wow that looks really really old there

00:24:28
on that and um but then you start to see

00:24:31
things that don't look old. So you see

00:24:33
those you see those bees with those

00:24:35
slopes on them that supposedly been

00:24:37
eroding for millions of years. Someone

00:24:38
said where's all the rubble that has

00:24:41
eroded off of those slopes? Why don't

00:24:42
you see it sitting on those shoulders of

00:24:45
all of those slopes for the entire

00:24:47
canyon? And I looked, there is no rubble

00:24:50
on those.

00:24:51
I mean, if they've been eroding for

00:24:52
millions of years, I'd expect to find

00:24:54
broken rocks falling off, sitting on the

00:24:56
shoulders, but they're swept absolutely

00:24:58
clean. He said, "Whatever has swept away

00:25:01
that rubble carved this canyon."

00:25:04
H, that makes sense.

00:25:07
I go around, I start seeing signs of

00:25:09
things that actually happened rapidly,

00:25:12
not slow. The present isn't really the

00:25:14
key to the past. The flood is the key to

00:25:16
the past

00:25:17
and present day conditions are are are

00:25:21
not capable of putting those geological

00:25:24
features we see. So that's that's an

00:25:26
illustration that's not complicated.

00:25:28
It's easy for everybody to understand.

00:25:30
You just bring to their attention things

00:25:34
that they've never seen before.

00:25:36
Yeah.

00:25:36
And and it works.

00:25:38
Yeah. That's I I love those flood

00:25:40
examples. What about on the the creation

00:25:43
side? like the 7-day creation story. Um,

00:25:47
how do you so many Christians and

00:25:49
non-Christians religion doesn't matter.

00:25:52
That's something that they struggle

00:25:53
with, I think. Um, trying to understand

00:25:55
like, well, was it seven days? Was it

00:25:57
not seven days? Uh, how have you thought

00:26:00
through that? And I know you have some

00:26:02
amazing exhibits uh in here that kind of

00:26:04
talk through that.

00:26:05
Right. Right. Well, first of all, if you

00:26:09
take the biblical record seriously and

00:26:11
at face value, and this is what I was

00:26:13
taught at Moody Bible Institute, we use

00:26:16
the the the normal method of Bible

00:26:18
interpretation. Now, the purpose says,

00:26:20
"Well, does that mean that we're all

00:26:20
abnormal if we don't hold to it?"

00:26:22
What it really means is you you treat

00:26:25
the Bible like you treat any other piece

00:26:28
of literature. And so when you read the

00:26:31
newspaper, you read it and you give

00:26:33
words their normal meaning in their

00:26:35
normal context. When I hand a patient a

00:26:39
prescription and they take it to the

00:26:41
pharmacy, the the pharmacist gives my

00:26:43
words their normal meaning in their

00:26:45
normal context. Uh or when I was an

00:26:48
engineer and we'd have a contract, they

00:26:50
give the contract the words are normal

00:26:52
meaning. Otherwise, if you can make the

00:26:54
words mean anything you want, then then

00:26:57
then contracts are pretty much

00:26:58
worthless.

00:26:59
So, that's what we meant by normal. So,

00:27:01
you give the words our normal meaning.

00:27:03
two, you um you recognize that we serve

00:27:08
an omnipotent God and he can do anything

00:27:11
he wants, how he wants, but there are

00:27:14
four basic characteristics which really

00:27:17
come out in the first two chapters of

00:27:19
Genesis to summarize everything that we

00:27:21
would be reading that really do

00:27:23
accurately explain what we would see in

00:27:25
creation at least for the parts that we

00:27:27
can see.

00:27:28
First, it says it was spoken. It was

00:27:31
like, "And God said, boom, and it was."

00:27:34
And God said, "And it was." And and

00:27:36
that's reaffirmed in Psalm 33 and in

00:27:38
Hebrews chapter one as well that by the

00:27:41
word of the Lord these things came. So

00:27:43
it was spoken.

00:27:44
Two, it was immediate. God said and it

00:27:48
was and it was also direct. Many things

00:27:53
God did it and it came out. So if you

00:27:55
take the creation of Adam, if we if we

00:27:58
say that as a historical record, it said

00:28:01
God took dust of the ground, formed a

00:28:03
man, breathed into his nostrils breath

00:28:05
of life. It's immediate and it's direct.

00:28:08
And then the fourth characteristic is

00:28:11
it's complete.

00:28:12
Adam was not a work in progress. He was

00:28:15
a completed entity.

00:28:18
He's adaptable. He can adapt, but he's a

00:28:21
completed entity. Eve, completed entity.

00:28:26
So direct, immediate, and complete. And

00:28:31
those are the desri the descriptions in

00:28:33
the Bible of this creation. And there's

00:28:36
no reason why we can't believe that

00:28:38
scientifically. In fact, as far as we

00:28:40
know, all the types of creatures are

00:28:42
pretty much complete. They can they can

00:28:44
they can go into different species, but

00:28:46
they don't change from one type of

00:28:48
creature to another. They're they're

00:28:49
complete and they're set. The Bible also

00:28:52
says they they reproduce after their

00:28:55
kind.

00:28:56
Oh, that's what everybody has observed

00:28:58
throughout all of human history. These

00:29:01
creatures re faithfully reproduce after

00:29:03
the kind. The Bible says in Genesis 1,

00:29:05
whose seed was in itself.

00:29:09
That's another really good biological

00:29:12
statement there. That's that's exactly

00:29:14
what we found before you could even see

00:29:17
a sperm in an egg before you even had

00:29:20
microscopes. The seed is in itself. And

00:29:23
then it it seems like you need the whole

00:29:25
self to make the seed work. So there's

00:29:28
no which came first, the chicken or the

00:29:30
egg. The Bible says the chicken came

00:29:32
with her eggs.

00:29:34
That makes sense. So scientifically,

00:29:38
there is some there's a lot of

00:29:39
consistency there in this account.

00:29:42
What about on the completeness? And I

00:29:44
know you're talking about things that

00:29:45
were made, things like space and the

00:29:48
stars and such which are ever expanding.

00:29:51
How do how do people reconcile that as

00:29:53
they get into it?

00:29:54
Well, there's no really no real need not

00:29:56
to recognize that space could be

00:29:59
expanding.

00:30:00
That doesn't have to be reconciled, you

00:30:02
know, biblically.

00:30:04
That that space could be expanding and

00:30:06
these galaxies and things we see could

00:30:09
be moving away from each other. Um,

00:30:12
that's that's a real possibility.

00:30:15
When we get into space, believe it or

00:30:17
not, the the explanations, our

00:30:19
explanations or even the conventional

00:30:21
explanations are really not nailed down

00:30:24
as tightly as NOVA might want you to

00:30:28
believe on that. There's a lot of things

00:30:31
yet to be discovered

00:30:33
and there's a lot of things we can't

00:30:34
measure. There's a lot of things that

00:30:36
come out different. And so all of the

00:30:39
explanations, ours and their

00:30:41
explanations are constantly changing.

00:30:44
They're being updated

00:30:46
and the like. I um I think one

00:30:50
explanation I really have liked is that

00:30:51
space is a fabric and God stretched this

00:30:54
out

00:30:55
and how and the and the rate at which he

00:30:57
stretched out maybe time was standing

00:30:59
still

00:31:00
and and that's that could happen even in

00:31:02
the universe right now

00:31:04
from the reference of someone looking at

00:31:07
a black hole

00:31:09
of where light may be trying to escape

00:31:11
being pulled in at that point from the

00:31:13
outside in time looks like it's standing

00:31:15
still at that there's all kinds of

00:31:18
phenomenon

00:31:19
which relate to time and space. But from

00:31:23
what we see, completed galaxies, they

00:31:25
look mature. They don't look like

00:31:26
they're in the process of evolving.

00:31:28
We've never seen stars form. They're

00:31:30
complete. They're sure. These these all

00:31:32
fit consistently with the Bible.

00:31:35
It's interesting leading here. You've

00:31:39
got things that are explaining creation

00:31:42
from space, underwater, on the ground,

00:31:45
new discoveries all the time. Uh you

00:31:47
mentioned that you're you're working

00:31:49
with the team to figure out what do we

00:31:50
research next? What are we getting into?

00:31:52
As you think through like the next 5 10

00:31:54
years, what are you and the team most

00:31:57
excited about some of the advances that

00:31:59
you're seeing in and actually trying to

00:32:01
research? That's a really good question

00:32:04
and and believe it or not, the areas

00:32:06
that we're mostly excited about would be

00:32:08
the areas that are probably the most

00:32:10
exciting to any conventional biologist

00:32:14
and it's biology. And I was a mining

00:32:17
engineer. I got my license in civil.

00:32:21
Civil and mechanical, they're still

00:32:22
standbys, but the fastest growing fields

00:32:25
are biomed engineering, biotechnology.

00:32:29
Those are those are really really

00:32:32
developing quickly. They're when I was

00:32:34
in college, we didn't even have those

00:32:36
departments, but now they're some of the

00:32:38
biggest, fastest growing wellunded

00:32:40
departments out there. Mhm.

00:32:42
So, how do you explain biology? You

00:32:45
know, when I was in school, I was taught

00:32:47
and I believed obviously

00:32:50
that there was a lot of randomness to

00:32:52
it. There was much not much purpose. It

00:32:54
had this non-theistic flavor,

00:32:56
purposeless, random, random changes

00:33:00
sorted out haphazardly by deadly

00:33:02
struggles to survive and a hitand- miss

00:33:05
process.

00:33:06
It was it was very clunky. and anything

00:33:09
that a real engineer, real designing God

00:33:13
would ever use.

00:33:17
And in some ways, it was put together to

00:33:19
give that impression. Yeah. No God would

00:33:21
ever do it like this. Why Why would God

00:33:23
use death and struggle to survive and

00:33:26
random genetic mutations and that makes

00:33:29
no sense?

00:33:30
Well, the reality is it doesn't make any

00:33:32
sense. And we're not really seeing that

00:33:35
as some of the major drivers. That was

00:33:37
all that was all verbiage. That was all

00:33:40
narrative gloss that was put on that.

00:33:42
What we see now is we see a biology

00:33:45
which can be engineered. We see a

00:33:47
biology which can be forward engineered.

00:33:50
And we've always had a biology which

00:33:52
could be reverse engineered, taking it

00:33:54
apart piece by piece and figuring out

00:33:56
how all of these things worked. So now

00:34:00
the approach towards biology

00:34:03
is kind of bifurcated. You have you have

00:34:06
the evolutionary biologists which still

00:34:08
want to hold to this random view,

00:34:10
purposeless view and everything because

00:34:13
of all of the metaphysical baggage that

00:34:15
goes with that. But then you have those

00:34:16
who want to make money. [laughter]

00:34:20
They want to have products.

00:34:21
Yeah.

00:34:22
And they and they see it as something

00:34:24
that can be engineered.

00:34:27
And I'm not advocating for all of the

00:34:29
manipulation. What I'm saying is it's

00:34:32
logical. It's purposeful. It's

00:34:35
understandable. Lots of engineering

00:34:37
principles seem to explain what's going

00:34:40
on here. So, biology looks just

00:34:44
phenomenally complicated but engineered.

00:34:48
That's the approach. That's what ICR is

00:34:50
looking at too is how do you explain

00:34:52
this incredible engineering in biology?

00:34:56
And our hypothesis is it looks

00:34:59
engineered because it was engineered.

00:35:03
And when we start with that premise, uh

00:35:06
that really gives us some really good

00:35:08
research um programs to develop. Now

00:35:10
some people say, well, what are your

00:35:12
research programs? Well, first of all,

00:35:14
we have some assumptions. I assume that

00:35:17
everything in biology can be reverse

00:35:19
engineered.

00:35:20
Not life itself, but your biological

00:35:23
functions. I I assume it can be reverse

00:35:25
engineered. I assume I'm going to find

00:35:27
purpose at every single level that I

00:35:30
research. M

00:35:31
I assume that I'm going to find control

00:35:33
systems for everything that is going on

00:35:37
inside your body. There's a control

00:35:39
system. There's a control area for it. I

00:35:41
assume that the only way I'm going to

00:35:44
really be able to explain causality of

00:35:46
this is through engineering principles,

00:35:49
solid engineering principles which every

00:35:51
engineer would use. That will be the

00:35:54
explanation. I assume that when I find a

00:35:57
man-made thing doing a similar function

00:35:59
as a creature that studying the man-made

00:36:03
thing can also help my study of the

00:36:06
biology which is the opposite of what we

00:36:08
normally do. We normally look at biology

00:36:10
and copy it to get products. I'm saying

00:36:13
you can also look at how humans have

00:36:15
engineered something and if you don't

00:36:17
know the biology that will give you a

00:36:19
clue to look

00:36:21
because they're going to probably

00:36:22
function by the same engineering

00:36:24
principles on all of this. I'm going to

00:36:28
take an entity for as a standalone

00:36:30
entity and assume that all of its

00:36:33
capabilities it will ever have are

00:36:36
inside of that creature. And so I will

00:36:40
assume that when I see changes like fish

00:36:43
that live in the stream that suddenly

00:36:45
find themselves in caves and now when we

00:36:48
see them they're they've lost

00:36:49
pigmentation. They've lost their

00:36:51
eyesight that that is not due to broken

00:36:54
pathways that have iteratively broken

00:36:57
over long periods of time. I'm going to

00:37:00
hypothesize that the fish can go from

00:37:03
the sighted pigmented type to the blind

00:37:06
hypopigmented sight

00:37:08
morph by internal capabilities which

00:37:12
enable it to do that purposefully

00:37:15
to live inside those caves along with

00:37:17
the dozens of other traits that need to

00:37:20
change on that fish to live in those

00:37:22
caves and I will look for the control

00:37:24
systems that allow that to happen. So

00:37:27
you have a a very rational research

00:37:30
program to research how the fish can

00:37:33
lose their eyes, how the fish can lose

00:37:35
their pigmentation, how they can thrive

00:37:38
inside that cave.

00:37:39
So that's the area

00:37:41
Yeah.

00:37:42
that we're really excited about.

00:37:43
That's exciting. I got um

00:37:46
a very brief maybe 5 10 minute uh

00:37:50
walkthrough of the fish example a few

00:37:52
months back and uh one of the things

00:37:54
that I was so impressed by was these

00:37:58
fish that now don't have eyes you guys

00:38:01
are working well I don't think this is

00:38:03
top secret cuz share with me but the uh

00:38:05
you guys are working to get eyes to

00:38:08
regrow in that fish and working on those

00:38:10
control systems and even just the

00:38:12
process to understand some of Those

00:38:13
control systems are so complex. Uh it's

00:38:16
just amazing. Uh the question I guess is

00:38:20
there's so many non Christian

00:38:23
non-creation scientists working on

00:38:24
similar things. How do people end up at

00:38:28
such different conclusions because it

00:38:30
seems like all of the the science ends

00:38:33
up pointing to everything that you guys

00:38:35
are saying from a creation standpoint.

00:38:37
Right.

00:38:38
That's a that's a uh that question is

00:38:42
right on the money because we can

00:38:45
research the exact same thing. In fact,

00:38:47
we can read their papers and and use

00:38:50
their observations. Oh, they they did

00:38:52
this, they found this, they did this,

00:38:53
they found this

00:38:55
and uh and it helps guide our research.

00:38:58
So, looking at the how the research is

00:39:01
being done is is really interchangeable.

00:39:04
they could take some of our things that

00:39:06
we found and use them in their studies.

00:39:08
It's how you're going to interpret it.

00:39:11
And so I I listed off all of my

00:39:15
assumptions. I assume it can be reverse

00:39:17
engineer. I assume this. So I have a a

00:39:20
framework for approaching biology from

00:39:22
this engineering perspective

00:39:24
with different assumptions.

00:39:27
And the evolutionary biologist has a

00:39:29
completely different framework.

00:39:32
They're going to assume that if there's

00:39:34
a genetic change, they're going to

00:39:36
assume that there's something broken,

00:39:39
that there was a mutation, a copying

00:39:41
error, or maybe it was damaged in some

00:39:44
way. That's that's where they're going

00:39:46
that's what they're going to assume. I'm

00:39:48
going to assume if I see a genetic

00:39:50
change that it might be regulated and it

00:39:53
might happen on purpose. They're not

00:39:56
going to let that into their view and at

00:39:58
least initially because something that's

00:40:00
regulated and sounds very purposeful

00:40:02
sounds engineered.

00:40:04
I'm not against that. [laughter] It's

00:40:06
like, okay, I'll leave that option open

00:40:10
there. And I'm not going to classify my

00:40:12
genetic change as something broken

00:40:15
unless there's really hard evidence that

00:40:16
says it's broken. M

00:40:18
so I think I actually have a better

00:40:20
approach for interpreting things and

00:40:23
understanding them from this

00:40:25
evolutionary perspective

00:40:28
which sees those things. I'm not going

00:40:29
to assume that all this came about due

00:40:31
to struggles to survive where one out

00:40:34
competed another and this and that. I'm

00:40:37
going to assume that probably most these

00:40:39
fish have inate have an innate

00:40:40
capability to turn off their eyes. And

00:40:44
that's really what we're researching

00:40:45
right now is how do these eyes go off?

00:40:49
That's just as remarkable as how do you

00:40:51
get them to come back on?

00:40:53
So it's the it's the framework at which

00:40:56
you're going to approach it and

00:40:58
interpret your findings

00:41:01
and what explanations you're going to

00:41:04
allow

00:41:05
into your find to explain it and which

00:41:08
ones you're going to exclude. Mhm.

00:41:10
In some ways, um, nothing's really off

00:41:13
the table. I I I'm I'm open to something

00:41:16
maybe being broken,

00:41:17
but I'm my my bias is until I find that

00:41:20
it's going to be purposeful. So, there's

00:41:23
a lot that I I I I'm open to

00:41:27
interpreting what the evolutionary

00:41:29
biologist would not even let in the door

00:41:32
on there. Th this this is something that

00:41:35
I I've really wanted to ask you. uh that

00:41:38
doesn't necessarily relate to that, but

00:41:40
it's the whole of what you're doing. Um,

00:41:43
a lot of a lot of Christians out there

00:41:46
um would talk about Jesus being the only

00:41:49
thing that matters. And you guys are

00:41:52
coming at this from a creation science

00:41:54
standpoint in creation. One of the

00:41:56
things I loved about the discovery

00:41:57
center, and I know I'm giving this away,

00:41:59
but listeners should actually go and see

00:42:01
it because it's more than I'm

00:42:02
describing, but so much is to do with

00:42:04
creation. And then right at the end,

00:42:07
everything points to Jesus, right? Talk

00:42:10
about how you deal with both of those

00:42:12
sides where it's like in the end you

00:42:14
came to know the Lord before you knew

00:42:17
anything about creation and somebody

00:42:19
doesn't need to know that, but how it's

00:42:20
helped you understand the Lord better.

00:42:22
Oh,

00:42:23
well, when people say Jesus is all that

00:42:25
matters, a lot of times they're just

00:42:27
thinking about the gospel. We people are

00:42:30
lost and they need to be saved and and

00:42:32
there is no other name under heaven

00:42:34
given among men whereby men must be

00:42:36
saved than the name of Jesus. We need to

00:42:38
get them the gospel. And that's why they

00:42:41
say Jesus is all that matters.

00:42:43
It's the gospel first. And sometimes

00:42:46
that's a a cover for I'm kind of

00:42:48
embarrassed that maybe the Bible might

00:42:50
be wrong on these scientific things.

00:42:52
Therefore, Jesus is all that matters and

00:42:55
it may be wrong on these other areas.

00:42:57
Well, there's two problems with that.

00:42:59
One, if it's wrong in these other areas,

00:43:01
how do you know it's not wrong in terms

00:43:03
of atonement and anything else that it

00:43:05
discusses? I mean, if it's the Bible has

00:43:08
lost its credibility historically and

00:43:11
scientifically, then it's not credible.

00:43:14
And most of us recognize that. Two, you

00:43:16
need the Bible to grow in grace and

00:43:18
knowledge of the Lord Jesus. So, you

00:43:20
can't start out doubting it and not

00:43:22
believing it right from the get-go and

00:43:26
then hope to to become a disciple.

00:43:29
Yeah.

00:43:29
Of the Lord Jesus. So, the whole goal is

00:43:32
to build disciples.

00:43:34
Number two, and I don't know if a lot of

00:43:36
Christians think about this, and I

00:43:38
didn't initially, is the creation is

00:43:42
also a revelation.

00:43:44
It's made to be a type of revelation.

00:43:47
The Bible is a revelation where without

00:43:50
it we could never know certain things

00:43:52
about God just from just from the

00:43:54
creation.

00:43:55
But the creation is another type of

00:43:57
revelation and particularly the

00:43:59
biological realm. That's what I just

00:44:01
love. Uh cosmology is good too but

00:44:04
biology is that's really the name of the

00:44:07
game. And as you research biology and

00:44:11
you look at the things that the Lord has

00:44:13
just put into a cell of which, you know,

00:44:16
hundreds could fit on the head of a pin,

00:44:19
little mini cities in there, factories

00:44:23
and all this other kind of stuff inside

00:44:26
a cell. And then you look at all the

00:44:28
phenomenal systems

00:44:30
in your body

00:44:32
that are just complex almost

00:44:35
mind-bogglingly complex on how complex

00:44:38
they are that in an experiential way is

00:44:43
is demonstrating to anybody but it

00:44:46
should be particularly to Christians

00:44:49
the power of the Lord Jesus Christ.

00:44:53
He can do this. He can do this. He

00:44:57
builds these things. Um, and his genius

00:45:01
to think it all up

00:45:04
and his wisdom to balance competing

00:45:06
needs, all these competing needs. And he

00:45:09
hits he hits that the optimal solution

00:45:12
to balance all those competing needs.

00:45:13
You you see this in a real tangible way

00:45:17
in the creation. And it's it's in every

00:45:20
area you look. It's revealing things

00:45:22
about the creator to us. Ah,

00:45:26
how now I know how he can hear all the

00:45:29
prayers of all the people praying at one

00:45:31
time.

00:45:32
Now I know he he can answer those

00:45:35
prayers. He's powerful enough. Now I

00:45:38
know what what he decides in his answer

00:45:42
will be good.

00:45:43
He's wise. He's wise beyond measure

00:45:47
on that. And so the creation is a

00:45:50
revelation of just how great and

00:45:54
powerful our savior, our creator really

00:45:58
is. And it should it should really

00:46:00
reinforce the faith of Christians. And

00:46:03
ICR exists to to establish biblical

00:46:08
credibility, but to tell this other area

00:46:11
of creation so that Christians are built

00:46:14
up in their faith.

00:46:15
Yeah, I love that. I've I had never

00:46:17
thought of creation being a revelation.

00:46:19
Uh, and I love how you frame that. Um,

00:46:23
okay. I could ask you 500 more questions

00:46:25
and still have more, but I want to ask

00:46:27
you 10 rapid fire questions that we'll

00:46:29
finish with.

00:46:30
Okay, let me get a drink [laughter]

00:46:31
here.

00:46:32
Who's the first person you think of when

00:46:34
I say servant leadership?

00:46:36
The Lord Jesus. All right.

00:46:38
Of course.

00:46:38
Favorite author or book?

00:46:41
My favorite author um Henry M. Morris

00:46:44
and the book is the Genesis record

00:46:48
and it's probably one of my favorite

00:46:49
books

00:46:50
and that kind of led to everything we're

00:46:52
seeing today

00:46:53
right here

00:46:54
which is awesome. Favorite food?

00:46:56
Um uh spaghetti.

00:46:58
Favorite thing to do in your free time?

00:47:00
Um woodworking.

00:47:01
What's a surprising fact about you?

00:47:04
The surprising what?

00:47:05
Fact about you? fact about me is um

00:47:12
that not only do I do all these

00:47:15
intellectual things, but I I built my

00:47:17
own house.

00:47:18
Wow. Yeah,

00:47:19
that is surprising. That's crazy. Um

00:47:22
favorite place you've been

00:47:24
to Sicily.

00:47:25
All right. Is there anywhere in the

00:47:26
world you want to go that you have not

00:47:28
been to?

00:47:30
Um,

00:47:32
I think

00:47:34
I Man, there's a lot of good places. I

00:47:38
think I'd like to go to some place in

00:47:40
Scandinavia.

00:47:41
Wow. Um, okay. If people are trying to

00:47:44
figure out about creation, how the world

00:47:47
got started, God. What's the first thing

00:47:50
you tell them to go check out?

00:47:51
I tell them to go to icr.org.

00:47:54
Love it.

00:47:54
I mean, thousands of articles,

00:47:56
absolutely free. You've got questions,

00:47:58
we probably have the answers.

00:47:59
What should they do when they get there?

00:48:01
Well, you just go into the search. We'll

00:48:03
look in your questions. First of all,

00:48:05
look on our look at our current research

00:48:07
on our front pages. Read some of those

00:48:08
articles on that.

00:48:10
Then, if you have questions, go to the

00:48:12
search and search out what you have. If

00:48:16
this is intriguing to you, go to your

00:48:17
church and say, "I'd like to have an

00:48:19
event."

00:48:20
Pull down the events tab and see how you

00:48:22
can schedule one of our events at your

00:48:24
church.

00:48:25
Wow, that's cool. Um, and we'll put just

00:48:28
for people listening, we'll make sure

00:48:29
there's links to everything where they

00:48:31
can access them in the show notes. Um,

00:48:33
all right. Best advice you've ever

00:48:34
received.

00:48:38
The best advice I've received is, um,

00:48:43
from Dr. Russ Humphre is let the Bible

00:48:46
be your guide and look to the Bible for

00:48:50
clues into research, scientific

00:48:53
research. M

00:48:54
um they they will those clues will be

00:48:56
there and search for that in terms of

00:48:58
scientific research.

00:49:00
Wow. Okay. And finally, a podcast. We

00:49:03
talk a lot about servant leadership and

00:49:04
I know we went in a lot of directions

00:49:06
today uh which are amazing. Why do you

00:49:08
think people should care about being

00:49:10
better servant leaders?

00:49:13
Well,

00:49:15
first of all, people are watching you

00:49:17
and that's what they're going to follow

00:49:19
more often than not. And the servant

00:49:22
leader is the these are good questions.

00:49:25
It's the opposite of the selfc centered

00:49:27
leader.

00:49:28
And the self-centered leader um really

00:49:32
soon loses their following

00:49:34
because people recognize they're they're

00:49:36
in it for themselves. They don't really

00:49:38
care for me. I'm a stepping stone or

00:49:40
just a widget in this person's life and

00:49:45
pretty soon you don't have much of a

00:49:47
following

00:49:48
on that. So, so from a pragmatic

00:49:51
standpoint, people are watching you and

00:49:54
um there's a there's a type of power

00:49:55
that comes from this personality that

00:49:57
you have a you really care for them.

00:50:00
You're going to serve them and look out

00:50:01
for them. But even more important than

00:50:04
that is it it pleases the ultimate

00:50:08
servant leader

00:50:10
is he finds that he he he says that's

00:50:13
good. I like that. And if nothing else,

00:50:17
it it it pleases him.

00:50:20
Yeah.

00:50:20
It's what he what he wants you to be.

00:50:23
Well, Randy, thank you for your time

00:50:25
today. Uh if people are in Texas, we're

00:50:27
going to link to where they can find the

00:50:28
Discovery Center. They should tour it

00:50:30
for sure. Uh I I can promise they'll be

00:50:33
amazed. And then separately, we didn't

00:50:35
talk about it at all, but you have a

00:50:36
podcast where people also want to get

00:50:38
more information and start following,

00:50:40
there's an awesome podcast that people

00:50:41
can subscribe to, which we'll throw the

00:50:43
YouTube in there. any any plug you want

00:50:45
to give on the podcast to tell people

00:50:46
what they'll hear?

00:50:47
Well, they'll be filmed in the studio

00:50:48
with they'll be put together in an

00:50:50
expert way. We went from about 10,000

00:50:54
subscribers on YouTube to over a

00:50:56
million.

00:50:56
Wow.

00:50:57
In about two years. So, high quality

00:50:59
podcast. We'll answer your questions. Um

00:51:01
you can find a link to that also at

00:51:03
icr.org or at the YouTube uh just under

00:51:06
Institute for Creation Research.

00:51:08
Wow. Well, thank you Randy. This

00:51:10
Thank you, Chris. It's a it's been a

00:51:11
blessing. Thank you for listening to

00:51:14
this episode of the Servant Leadership

00:51:16
Podcast. If you enjoyed what you heard,

00:51:18
please give it a thumbs up and leave a

00:51:20
comment below. Don't forget to subscribe

00:51:24
and hit the notification bell to never

00:51:26
miss an update. Be sure to check out the

00:51:28
servantleershippodcast.org

00:51:30
for more updates and additional bonus

00:51:32
content.

Back To Top